McDonald`s, for example, offers all employees the choice between a flexible or fixed contract with a guaranteed minimum number of hours or a zero-hour contract. The fast-food giant said the initial adoption of the guaranteed hourly contract across the country was around 10 percent, but was highly dependent on the region. For example, in restaurants with a high number of students, acceptance was only 5%. McDonald`s says some employees like the flexibility of zero hours, for example, zero hours means parents can take time off during school holidays and students can take time off for exams. However, a 2015 report by Working Families found that zero-hour contracts harm family life, make it harder for parents to arrange (and maintain) childcare, and disrupt workers` benefits. In addition, for many workers, refusing to work shorter, longer, or simply different hours could easily result in no work at all. Basically, the zero-hour contract goes both ways; An employer is not obliged to specify a minimum number of hours, and an employee is not obliged to accept a certain number of hours. It was suggested that the precise wording of the definition should bring the balance of power much further for the employer than for the employee. More than half of workers in the UK want a crackdown on zero-hour contracts, according to a survey by the TUC and GQR Research. Those who support the agreements allowed by zero-hour contracts disagree with the claim that there has been a so-called „explosion” of zero-hour contracts, pointing out that the level of these agreements remains relatively constant at around 3% of the workforce. Zero-hour contracts allow workers flexibility in the amount of time they want to devote to their work. For example, students or parents may find them useful because they may take more hours during times when they have more time available and are not required to do a certain number at times when they do not have time.
It`s easy to see why. These contracts allow employers to reduce costs by hiring staff with no guarantee of work, hours of work or salary. The government then commissioned the Taylor review in zero-hour contracts, and after that review in 2017, further changes were introduced. Workers were entitled to detailed payslips and a written declaration of their employment data on the first day of work. But our surveys show that two-thirds of workers would prefer to have a contract with guaranteed hours – and only one in four actually prefer to be in a ZHC. In his review of modern labour practices, Matthew Taylor recommended the right to demand guaranteed hours of work and higher minimum wage rates for workers on zero-hour contracts, in recognition of the uncertainty of their contract. Trade unionists argue that enforcement is weak legislation and means that employers can always deny workers fixed working hours. In addition to a right to stand for election, the Liberal Democrats are also proposing to increase the minimum wage by 20% for zero-hour workers working in „normal demand periods” to compensate for insecurity. Recent research by the Living Wage Foundation (FLM) found that one-third of workers are informed of their shift less than a week in advance – a figure that rises to half for low-income people. Not all of these workers will have zero-hour contracts, but this is a common reality for those who are.
Workers in the gig economy typically have zero-hour contracts or short-term freelance contracts rather than permanent jobs with a specific number of hours. They are also known as independent contractors. In the same way that proponents of zero-hour contracts actively defend the benefits of these agreements for some people, those who oppose the practice represent an alternative narrative for others. Similarly, the employee is not required to work a certain number of hours, so one week he can have high availability, and the next he can only have a few hours off. Similarly, from the perspective of many workers, zero-hour contractual arrangements are also seen as beneficial, especially for those seeking occasional income and can be completely flexible. This applies in particular to persons in school, semi-pensioners, persons receiving special care (usually, but not exclusively, for children) and those seeking a second „complementary” job. Under zero-hour contracts, employers are not required to provide a minimum number of hours of work and employees are not obliged to accept the work offered. Rights vary depending on employment status. Most zero-hour workers are considered workers, but they can acquire the status of worker that changes the nature of the rights to which they are entitled. Nearly one in five people who have experienced short shift announcements or shift absences say they have to pay higher child care fees as a result.
The LWF claims that not giving notice of working hours imposes an „uncertainty premium” of around £30 a month on almost half of all shiftworkers. Zero-hour contracts are not designed for training and development, as workers are considered temporary and are only needed when needed. The opportunity to take on additional responsibilities related to any career development is therefore not available to employees. An employee may refuse to sign a contract that does not guarantee them a certain number of hours, but there is no way to force an employer to provide a better contract. Some argue that zero-hour contracts provide flexibility for employers and employees. Three different voices, three similar stories of life with a zero-hour contract. Irish trade unions recently pushed through a near-total ban on zero-hour contracts and other important rights for people in precarious employment. Zero-hour workers also miss important workplace rights, such as protection against unfair dismissal and sick pay. „It is hard to believe that the government is still delaying an employment law that was first announced a year and a half ago,” said TUC General Secretary Frances OâGrady. „It`s time for the government to stop dithering and keep its promise to strengthen workers` rights. The workers have spoken.
They want wholesale workers` rights to be improved. Ministers are due to table the jobs bill in the Queen`s Speech next month and use it to ban zero-hour contracts and end workplace exploitation once and for all. We are here to answer your questions about zero-hour contracts so that you are not exploited. At the heart of these legal discussions are the definitions of the terms „workers” and „workers” and the scope of rights that these different forms of employment status offer to stakeholders. Traditionally, those with zero-hour contracts have been considered workers. However, this contrasts with a 2017 TUC survey, which shows that two-thirds of zero-hour workers wanted jobs with guaranteed hours, compared to only 25% who prefer to be at zero hours. Employers may not know or ignore their casual workers` vacation rights, so even though they shouldn`t, zero-hour contract workers may want to track their hours and make sure they get the vacation pay they are entitled to. It has already been suggested that 90% of employees at retailer Sports Direct work on a zero-hour contract and that zero-hour contracts are also heavily used by companies such as JD Wetherspoon, McDonalds and Subway. Buckingham Palace have also reportedly used zero-hour contracts for its seasonal summer workers. Zero-hour workers are supposed to benefit from statutory annual leave and the national minimum wage, but they are often denied these basic rights and have no legal right to sick pay. Two of the major electoral parties mention the zero-hour contract policy, ranging from the right to demand fixed working hours to a total ban. What do parents and political scientists think? According to the ACAS website, workers with these contracts still have the same employment rights as „regular” workers and are fully entitled to annual leave and other legal benefits, such as compensation for work-related travel expenses.
A person who has worked the same regular shifts for six months is therefore likely to be considered working on a full-time contract rather than a zero-hour contract. These cases were important because of how regular working time contracts offer greater legal rights than a zero-hour contract. Ultimately, it should never be used to try to circumvent employment and not give standard workers what they should be entitled to in terms of job security, regular income, and benefits.
Najnowsze komentarze